October10
By posts like this, where someone is attacking the “right” for “attacking” a kid. And, in this particular case, for discovering just how out of touch a huge, huge number of folks are from reality.
According to Hilzoy, being in a family that makes 45k, sends their kids to private schools and lives in a house that is 3000 square feet is being “poor”, and being a member of the “working class”. You deserve government assistance (S-Chip) to pay your health bills. /Boggle I look at my salary, and my home… wow, I’m poor!
I mean, that mostly says it all. Thats how out of touch a big chunk of “liberals” are. There is no concept of personal responsibility. She claims that not stating that they only pay 500 dollars a year or so for the tuition isn’t reporting the facts. It doesn’t occur to her that they could put that 500 dollars toward the bills they owe. Even if they owed say 500,000 (a number I pulled out of nowhere), then they could owe 500 dollars less. They live in a 3000 square foot home. A family of 6. In 3000 square feet. Yep. Thats poor. Who cares about their mortgage? Its not relevant.
She contends that the government should bail the frost family out for the bad choices that the family has made. Or, at the least, that the four kids should not be “punished” for the bad choices of their parents. In her world, personal responsibility doesn’t exist.
Now, I love reading Hilzoy. She’s typically thoughtful, and she is logical. Her world, however, is based on so many false assumptions that its amazing we live in the same country. She is a bee – solidly devoted to the hive, and hive mind, and finds the idea of individuality abhorrent.
1) There is no right to health care. If you can’t pay for health care, you shouldn’t get it. To say that a right to health care exists, is tantamount to enslaving doctors. After all, someone has to provide this “right”. If an individual doctor, or anyone, decides to provide free access to their skills, then more power to them. Thats a noble thing to do, well worth applauding. Its very, very wrong to say that they HAVE to do that though. Or that they HAVE to provide access to their skills at some predetermined rate of compensation.
2) Just because something is happening which is not desirable – like a lot of people, kids or otherwise, dieing due to a lack of health care, that doesn’t mean that its the governments job to prevent the undesirable act. The government, especially the federal government, has a very limited role.
3) Individuals are responsible for their own actions. If you make a choice to follow a life path where you don’t have insurance, or some way of accessing health care, then you should not get it. I’ve made a choice to live my life in such a fashion that I’ll never have a private jet. Should I get one given to me anyway? No.
I’ll edit on this a bit later, and add in some more links.